I've been indulging my inner 20-year-old the last couple of months, so please bear with me.
The Reverend Will the Thrill
I've been indulging my inner 20-year-old the last couple of months, so please bear with me.
The Reverend Will the Thrill
This week's film is, without question, a classic. One of the greatest thrillers ever made. Starring one of the greatest actors of the twentieth century. Directed by one of cinema's greatest auteurs. It's got humour, intrigue, excitement, sex, music, paranoia, voyeurism, and murder (maybe?).
As I think may be fairly obvious from previous posts, I love music. I've devoted posts to specific musicians, I've referenced songs in other posts, I've even repurposed popular song titles as titles to some of my individual posts. Even the name of this blog takes its name from a Pretenders song.
Popular culture--specifically music and movies--is probably the closest thing I get to any kind of religion. I find it spiritually uplifting in ways that going to church never could do for me.
Every week on Facebook for about five years now, I have posted a YouTube link to an album I really like and a few words about why I'm drawn to that particular album. Since February, I have also been posting a film recommendation to accompany that with a link to the film's trailer.
On three occasions over the last few months, Facebook has made it very difficult to do this. For two of my film recommendations (including the one for this week, which I will present in my next post), when I attempted to add the trailer, I was informed that it violated Facebook's community standards, which I find laughable. One of those films is considered a classic by every measure and the other is just a supremely well-written 1990s rom-com.
The final straw occurred today when I found out that they had removed this week's album recommendation for similar reasons. I'm trying to appeal it, but since I'm sure no actual, sensible human being is actually, sensibly reading it and they didn't give me any way of explaining why I thought their decision was wrong (I basically just answered a multiple-choice form), I doubt my appeal will be successful. So, in response, I'm going to start posting my album and film recommendations here and then posting that link on my Facebook page. Let's see what their algorithm makes of that!
The Reverend Will the Thrill Presents the Album of the Week!
Earlier this month, singer/songwriter/author/entertainer/entrepreneur/pilot/sailor/beach bum Jimmy Buffett died from a rare form of skin cancer. As I said some time back regarding the death of Rolling Stones drummer Charlie Watts, I don't normally get bent out of shape over celebrity deaths just because I don't know them personally. I've had the pleasure of meeting a few and shaking some hands in my life, but I never got to know them as people. But as I get older, if a celebrity's work leaves a lasting impression on me, their death does tend to hurt. Like Charlie Watts, Jimmy Buffett's passing hurts.
For about a year, I had a digital subscription to The New York Times. Unfortunately, about a year ago, the economy went to pot. Since pot is still illegal in the state where I live, I found myself in a position where I had to drop the subscription in order to save a few bucks each month. However, I still get their daily newsletter in my email (and I play Wordle on the app).
In the newsletter for Saturday, 18 March, 2023, Melissa Kirsch mentioned a list of likes and dislikes by the author Susan Sontag which she "stumble[s] across" with what would appear to be some degree of regularity. Sadly, whenever Sontag's name is brought up, I'm always reminded of one reviewer who described her novels as "self-indulgent, overrated crap." Since I've never read any of her novels and, therefore, can't back up that opinion, I looked at her list of likes and dislikes.
As a compulsive list-maker myself, I was thoroughly fascinated by these brief glimpses into Sontag's personality. Part of me wants to know the context, although, strangely, I really enjoy the mystery of not knowing--why, for example, did she like Louis XIII furniture? Why did she not like Robert Frost? And, since she didn't specify, did she not like Frost the man, or was she just not a fan of his poetry? Or, perhaps maybe she knew a completely different person named Robert Frost who was just an asshole?
As Kirsch writes, "Each item taken alone could be passed off as a caprice, but in the list, there are clues to the person--a person who likes babies but dislikes couples, who likes the smell of mowed grass but dislikes the cold... Absent any explanation, the meaning of the list is malleable." Frankly, I like that about lists like this. I particularly enjoy the possibility of one's likes and dislikes seeming to be contradictory. And I love the fact that it probably is not contradictory to the person who made the list.
Another point that tickles my fancy is that, as Kirsch also points out, "One's likes and dislikes are forever changing, too, which permits a person to be complicated and fickle and to change their mind." While my likes and dislikes have been cultivated from a lifetime of personal experience, I like a lot of things that I didn't like when I was younger, like punk rock. The reverse is also true--when I was a child, I loved bananas. I ate them frequently. Today, I'm physically repulsed by them. Even just the smell of a banana makes me nauseous.
As I said, I am a compulsive list-maker myself. My lists are usually centered around popular culture--best cinematic death scenes, best songs to play in the car, favourite guitarists, etc. I seldom find myself making practical lists--I don't have "to-do" lists, for example. Even my ability to make grocery lists is spotty. For some reason, though, I've never made a list as simple as basic likes and dislikes.
I was surprised by the amount of soul-searching that went into it, particularly my list of dislikes. I found myself asking how revealing I wanted to be. After all, a lot of the items I put on the list could potentially bring some questions and criticisms (an admittedly unlikely possibility, given the number of people likely to read this). As much as I enjoy screwing with people, how contradictory do I want to sound? Should I let the reader ponder the fact that I like Reese's Peanut Butter Cups, but I don't like peanut butter... or even peanuts?
One of the things I like about this is that I can't be comprehensive. There are too many things I like and dislike that I can't possibly mention all of them. There are also a lot of things that, at this point in my life, I've never experienced. For example, I've never had escargot, therefore, I don't know if I like it or not. Consequently, I'm sure I'll revisit this in a future post... one day, after I've had some new experiences and don't have anything else to write about. In the meantime, I've kept my lists to fifteen items apiece.
Things I like: Watching old black and white movies on a rainy Saturday afternoon, watching Steve McQueen films on a Sunday morning (the actor Steve McQueen, not the director), medium rare steak, bagpipe music, peeling dried rubber cement from any object, slowly opening a two-liter bottle of soda for the first time and feeling the label crumple in the palm of my hand, psychedelic rock music of the 1960s, women who don't shave their body hair, emptying a really full three-hole punch, stick shifts, cheeseburgers, the feeling of my teeth biting into a mushroom, bibliosmia, Art Deco, and single malt Scotch.
Things I dislike: Cole slaw, parking garages with cheaply produced automatic gates, having to repeat myself, bureaucracies, the ringing of a telephone, texting abbreviations (OMG, it's like we live in a world of eight-year-olds. Seriously, WTF?), human stupidity (especially my own), people who mispronounce the word "nuclear," cooked tomatoes, raw celery, people who say "unquote" instead of "end quote," our collective dependence on cell phones (especially my own), Daylight Saving Time, and having to repeat myself.
Now that I've gotten that off my chest, please feel free to share some of yours and I'm actually happy to discuss my list if you really want context.
When I was thirteen years old, I came home from school to discover that the Soviet Union had done something that they couldn't possibly do (I think they somehow repealed the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution). The U.S. considered this an act of war and responded with nuclear weapons. Of course, the Soviets retaliated in kind. From my kitchen window, I watched as a missile was about to explode just up the road. The only thing I could do was pick up the phone and frantically try to call you to tell you I loved you. I don't remember my call getting through.
Of course, this is the point where I woke up to discover the whole thing was just a bizarre dream/nightmare. But I did get an uneasy feeling that if I didn't tell you how I felt about you that something globally catastrophic would happen.
Two weeks later, I finally worked up the courage to tell you I loved you. Your reaction was pretty much what I predicted. I walked away from it feeling the way I thought I'd feel--rejected, dejected, and thoroughly humiliated. But, hey, the world didn't end, so I must have done something right.
When I was 27, those feelings were still there. We'd been through a lot together since the end of the Cold War--good times, bad times, two weeks in England and Scotland. You were my best friend. I've never in my life been closer to anyone. No matter how much I tried to convince myself that any youthful, romantic feelings I had for you were in my more youthful, romantic past, everyone around me seemed to know otherwise. Clearly I was in denial.
I debated putting my heart on the line once again. I didn't say anything because we'd just moved in together with my cousin a month earlier and I didn't want to make things awkward for any of us, especially him. I also knew there was no way I could compete with a British accent that was fifteen years my senior. So I said nothing. I'd been through that humiliation before and it still stung. I didn't see the point in subjecting myself to it again.
I think it's safe to say that the events of 11 September, 2001, constituted a global catastrophe. Arguably the ramifications of it persist to this day. When I was first informed as to what was going on in New York and Washington, DC, the first thing I thought of was that dream I had when I was thirteen and the virtually public humiliation I forced myself to endure in order to prevent a calamity such as what we were now experiencing. Did I really save the world that autumn day in 1987? Probably not. I find it highly unlikely that I have that kind of influence over international politics. But on the off, off, off chance that I did, what if I could have prevented 9/11 simply by telling you that I love you? That would have also prevented a 20-year war in Afghanistan, a side boondoggle in Iraq... honestly, who knows how differently the world might have turned out?
I tend to look at the human race as God's failed third grade science project--put specimens in a jar and see which one(s) will eat the other(s) first. In the intervening two decades, I've watched the human race, specifically America, decline drastically. Wars, plague, climate change, mass shootings, road rage, partisan politics--we all know how to fix these things, but we refuse to do so because ultimately it negatively affects the bottom line. There's no real money in it for the greedy, corrupt people who are running everything. We can fix a lot of problems, but the real root cause of it--mass human stupidity--is incurable. And I've lost so much faith in my own species, that I'm not sure it's worth saving.
As I write this, it would appear that all hell is on the verge of breaking loose in Eastern Europe. I'm predicting that if (more likely when) it does, it will start World War III. Honestly, I genuinely don't care anymore. I figure it's been roughly 80 years since the last one, we're overdue for another. And yet, in spite of my possibly apocalyptic apathy, I feel I have a moral obligation to try to prevent it if I can.
Yes... after all these years, I'm still in love with you. I don't know why--I mean, after all, you're a lying cunt--but I am.
I know I'm not supposed to feel this way, but falling in love is the only thing in my life that I truly regret. It cost me my heart, my soul, my best friend (a couple of times), arguably my immune system, and my left hip. It turned me into a bitter, cynical old man before I was 30. It brings out the absolute worst traits in me as a human being. Frankly, I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy. And I don't know if I regret falling in love or if I regret falling in love with you, but since you're the only person with whom I've ever truly been in love, I can't really make a proper distinction.
Many years ago, I gave up on ever finding anyone with whom to share my life. I realize that's bleak, but I figure if you can't measure up to married men and suicidal drunks in the eyes of your own best friend, you probably won't find anyone. Besides, you can only get called a "really nice guy" so many times before you start to believe your own bad press. I get it--I'm no one's ideal man. The good news is, I no longer feel like I have to impress anyone. Besides, I've never found anyone who made me feel the way you did... and I mean that in a good way.
As cynical, bitter, resentful, and angry as I am toward you (and, believe me, I am), for some fucking ungodly reason, every time I see an old picture of you, something inside me melts and I begin to ache in ways that only missing someone you love can cause. In those moments, all I want to do is hold you as tightly as I can for as long as you'll let me. If I'm honest with myself, that's really all I've ever wanted since we were eleven years old.
I know you don't feel the same toward me (or at least that's what you claim). Hell, you probably won't even read this, but at least it will be out there in all its humiliating glory. I doubt that it will change the world, certainly not for the better. As I said, I'm not sure humanity as a whole is worth saving, and I know I no longer care. But, just in case it does make a difference, I suppose it would be immoral of me not to at least try to do the right thing. And if World War III doesn't break out in the next few weeks, I guess it will have worked.